Your stop for Clarke, Frederick, Page, Shenandoah, and Warren agriculture and natural resource education.
Monday, June 29, 2020
Wednesday, June 24, 2020
Tuesday, June 23, 2020
Racial Justice in the Food System
Pesticide Applicator Updates
Effective June 3, 2020:
1. Growers and commercial applicators may use existing stocks that were in their possession on June 3, 2020, the effective date of the Court decision. Such use must be consistent with the product’s previously-approved label, and may not continue after July 31, 2020.
2. Distribution or sale by the re
3. Distribution or sale of existing stocks of the products listed above that are already in the possession of dealers, retailers, or any other persons is permitted only for the purposes of proper disposal or to facilitate return to the registrant or a registered establishment under contract with the registrant.
Questions regarding the return of stocks of these products should be directed to the product registrant or distributor/retailer.
Thank you.
Agricultural workers and pesticide handlers directly support the nation’s agricultural production and food supply and EPA is committed to ensuring they are protected from workplace hazards.
EPA has released guidance regarding the annual pesticide safety training requirements outlined in the Agricultural Worker Protection Standard (WPS) that offers flexibility during the COVID-19 public health emergency.
The Agency is aware that COVID-19 may make it difficult for agricultural employers and handler employers to provide WPS pesticide safety training or hire agricultural workers and pesticide handlers who have been trained in the last 12 months, as required by the WPS.
In response, the guidance aims to inform agricultural employers and handler employers of flexibilities available under the WPS to allow continued protection for employees and agricultural production:
- EPA encourages in-person training if workplace
protections to maintain a healthy work environment are able to be
implemented. For example, an employer may be able to provide pesticide
safety training outside, in smaller than usual groups with well-spaced
participants.
- Alternatively, WPS training can be presented remotely,
provided all WPS training requirements are met.
- The employer is ultimately responsible for ensuring
the training meets all requirements outlined in the WPS. For example, the
training must still be presented in a manner the trainees can understand,
in an environment reasonably free from distractions, and cover the full
training content using EPA-approved training materials.
- Once the training ends, the employer must document
successful completion under a qualified trainer.
Thursday, June 18, 2020
Monday, June 15, 2020
Top Things to Think about Before Buying Hay
Friday, June 12, 2020
Xtendimax, Engenia, and FeXapan Registrations Vacated. What now?
Xtendimax, Engenia, and FeXapan Registrations Vacated. What now?
The dicamba products Xtendimax, Engenia, and FeXapan had their registrations vacated June 3, 2020 by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The EPA announced June 8, 2020 a final cancellation order for these products.
Existing stocks, in possession on June 3, 2020 (the date of the court’s decision), can be used by farmers and commercial applicators by July 31. Use of these products must be consistent with the previously approved label.
The EPA’s full statement is here: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2020-06/documents/final_cancellation_order_for_three_dicamba_products.pdf. Details on use of existing stocks are on page 11.
More background information can be found here
Tavium (dicamba + S-metolachlor) is also still legal to use. Tavium was not mentioned in the lawsuit making Tavium the only way to legally apply dicamba to Roundup Ready 2 Xtend soybeans or Xtendflex cotton. This product is already in short supply and may be difficult to acquire. Tavium cannot be used on double crop soybean.
There are effective alternatives to dicamba. In RR2 Xtend soybean, I recommend Flexstar GT in place of dicamba. This product is not currently in short supply, but there is potential for that to occur. So I encourage farmers that plan to use Flexstar GT to go ahead and acquire it. Other alternative products can be found in Table 5.54 on page 5-182 of the Pest Management Guide. Additionally, information on controlling Palmer amaranth in soybean is here: https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/2808/2808-1006/2808-1006.html and common ragweed is here: https://www.pubs.ext.vt.edu/content/dam/pubs_ext_vt_edu/spes/spes-143/SPES-143.pdf. In cotton, most varieties have the option of using Liberty, which is my recommendation in place of dicamba. But other alternative products can be found in Tables 5.112 and 5.113, starting on page 5-344.
Farmers should consider changing soybean herbicide traits for double crop acres or any soybean ground that has not yet been planted. LibertyLink, LLGT27, and Enlist are all good options in place of RR2 Xtend. Farmers may also consider a Roundup Ready variety as well, to potentially save tech fees compared to RR2 Xtend, but there are very few of these even before this announcement. I realize changing this late in the year may not be feasible and the best performing varieties may not be available. If farmers choose to change varieties, make sure that the variety has both strong yield potential and the herbicide trait of choice.
This ruling does not apply to dicamba products such as Clarity and Banvel, that are not labeled for use in Xtend traited crops, so these can continue to be used in pastures, corn, and other labeled uses. Dicamba products that are not labeled for use in dicamba-tolerant crops have been and continue to be illegal to use over-the-top of RR2 Xtend soybean and Xtendflex cotton.
This ruling comes at the absolute worst time during the season. There may be temptation to use dicamba illegally, but I strongly encourage us all to think about the implications of such actions on agriculture. These products have been and will continue to be under scrutiny from the non-ag public.
Thursday, June 11, 2020
Hay Equipment Guide For the Small or New Farmer
Introduction
You operate a small farm, own a compact tractor and have decided you want to make your own hay. Maybe you're tired of paying high prices for hay. Maybe you're constantly disappointed by the quality of hay available. Maybe you're fed up with the contract hay baler who doesn't think your hay field is a priority.Selecting the Right Hay Equipment
Choosing the Right Hay Mower
Sickle Bar Mowers
- Requires little horsepower. If you have a very low power tractor of 15 horsepower or less, this option will really be your only choice. Though there are very small drum mowers, if you have an older compact utility tractor like a Kubota 5000 or 6000 series, a sickle bar mower will be your best bet.
- Lighter weight. If your tractor is very lightweight or has very little front weight, a sickle bar is the lightest weight hay mower and therefore your best (and safest) option.
- Angled mowing capability. If you are mowing ditch banks, sickle bars are the only hay mower style specifically designed to work well below (or above) horizontal. Some mowers even allow you to work in the vertical position for trimming hedges or trail edges.
- Less motion = less dust. While disc and drum mowers create a vortex of moving air across the blades, sickle bars have relatively little motion. As a result, less dirt will be cast into the air and your newly cut hay.
- Forward speed. A sickle bar mower's forward speed is much slower than disc and drum mowers. They can mow a wide swath, but maximum speeds are only about half of other designs.
- Clogging. They become easily dogged when working in very dense, lodged, or already cut material. Clogging is also more of a problem when blades begin to get dull.
- Blade repair. When blades become dull, sharpening or replacing them can be time consuming and expensive.
- Repair expense. Damage due to hitting an unknown obstruction can be expensive to fix.
Disc Mowers
- No clogging. Disc mowers handle thick and lodged hay with ease.
- High cutting speeds. If you have the horsepower, there is almost no limit to how fast you can drive through the field. Speeds of up to 15 mph or more are feasible, though very few tractors can do this safely.
- Ease of transition. Hydraulic lift allows you to go from working to transport and back again without leaving the tractor seat. This is a time-saving feature when mowing several small fields.
- Need for hydraulics. If your tractor does not have hydraulics, you won't be able to lift the cutter bar vertically to get through gates and other narrow areas. Until recently this one factor kept many people from choosing a disc mower. As of this writing, there is only one exception: the brand Galfre offers a 4-disc mower, the Model165, with a cutting width of 5’ 5” that does not require hydraulics to operate.
- Weight. You have the horsepower and the hydraulics, but your tractor is lightweight. This can be a safety hazard because of the much heavier cutter bar compared to a sickle bar mower. When the mower is in the vertical transport position it can tip the whole tractor over unexpectedly.
- Expense of repair. If you frequently mow in places where you might hit something solid like a boulder, old fence post, etc. Disc mowers, when damaged, can be extremely expensive to repair.
Drum Mowers
- No hydraulic requirement. You do not have to have hydraulics on your tractor. For transport, the drums swing to the rear of the tractor manually.
- Durability. Drum mowers are easily the most rugged of the hay mower types. They rarely sustain damage even from striking an unmovable object. This makes them a great choice for contract cutting in unfamiliar fields or for mowing unruly pastures.
- High ground speeds. A drum mower can be run at even higher speeds than a disc mower, and double the speed of a sickle bar.
- Low power consumption. This feature is important particularly witf1 older utility tractors of modest horsepower.
- Contour mowing. Because the drums are very heavy, it is not recommended to hang the mower out over a downward slope. Drum mowers also do not pivot enough to effectively follow extreme contours like a sickle bar will.
- Weight. The drum mower's heavy weight can be detrimental for tractors with light front ends. Drum mowers are very heavy in relation to other mower types of the same width. This can make maneuverability and transport difficult if there is not sufficient weight holding the front wheels of the tractor down.
- Windrowing. Since most drum mowers windrow the cut crop, it will not dry in the field without being spread out or double-raked. Galfre drum mowers are the exception to this rule. Their conditioning system fluffs and spreads the cut crop for faster drying time.
Choosing the Right Hay Tedder
Heavy hay in humid climates can dry faster by teddlng. It is also an indispensable machine for spreading hay out to dry after a rain. Although some farmers get by without a tedder, it is smart to have a machine that can do this important job if and when you need it. Furthermore, if you have a conventional drum mower other than a Galfre with a conditioning system, the windrow created by the mower will not dry unless spread cut or turned over.
Choosing the Right Hay Rake
Wheel Rakes
Parallel Bar Rakes
Rotary Rakes
Belt Rakes
Choosing the Right Baler
Mini Round Baler
- Very low horsepower requirement. A mini round baler needs only around 15 horsepower to operate.
- Lighter weight. Round balers weigh much less than square balers. This means they are safer to operate on hills, and tractors of any size can easily pull them.
- Simpler design. Round balers are simpler machines than square balers, with fewer adjustments required and fewer parts to break.
- Smoother operation. Square balers “kick” up to 90 times per minute. On a small tractor this constant jerking motion can be somewhat fatiguing.
- Small size. A mini round baler will actually fit in the back of a pickup truck. In storage it will take up about a quarter as much space as a square baler.
- Better weather resistance. If there is any chance the bales may stay in the field for any extended period of time, mini round bales will hold up much better to rain and dew. Net wrap provides an even higher level of protection.
- Lower output capacity. Because of the smaller pickup of a round baler and the need to stop when tying a bale, production rate with a mini round baler will only be about 1/3 to ½ what is possible with a square baler.
- Marketability. If you sell hay, you may find that your customers, who are accustomed to square balers, will not like the round bales. Practically speaking there is no difference, but people tend to stick with what they know.
- Stacking. These mini round bales actually stack well. But they will never stack as tight as a stack of square bales. This really only makes a difference if you are needing to stack 15 or 20 feet high.
Square Balers
- High baling capacity. Square balers never have to stop to wrap or tie a bale, so are able to bale a maximum tonnage in a given period of time.
- Easy-to-handle bales. Square bales are the easiest shape to stack, and with an average weight of around 40 pounds for an Abbriata square bale, are easy to lift and move around.
- Resale. If you are selling your hay, most customers will prefer the familiar shape and easy-feeding flakes of a square bale.
- Weight. Square balers are quite heavy compared to a mini round baler. If you are baling steep slopes or have a very small tractor, a square baler’s weight can become hazardous.
- Bales can’t be rained on. Square bales have no resistance to moisture, acting like a sponge in wet conditions.
- Mechanically complicated. Though a properly maintained square baler will run for years without any adjustments needed, a square baler must be carefully and properly set up and timed to work properly. Damage can occur to a baler that is mis-timed.









